
(Flickr photo by James Cridland)
In times of economic distress, it’s natural for folks to consider optional housing possibilities.
Communal living is, of course, an age-old system that has, however, tended to lose its appeal among those who have experimented with it in this country. Yet kibbutzim do seem to work pretty well in Israel.
Here, it is easy to imagine that collective homeownership could catch on as the solution to prices that remain out of reach for many of us. However, such arrangements are not without their complexities, as Phoebe Chongchua reminds readers in Realty Times.
Questions that must be considered carefully include the following:
- In the case of two couples in a household, what happens if there should be a divorce?
- What if someone doesn’t keep up with monthly payments? And what if someone just wants to drop out?
- How will responsibilities as mundane as taking out the garbage or as material as paying the bills be divided? And how will adherence to those responsibilities be enforced?
- Since living full time with others is way different from a vacation with them, what assurance do the participants have that they will be able to stand each other month after month?
It is wise for those exploring the possibility of collective ownership to discuss their vision for the endeavor exhaustively and to understand what an enormous effort will be necessary for a harmonious relationship to survive close quarters.
For anyone diving into the choppy waters of collective ownership, nothing will be more important than working with a lawyer to draft an agreement that covers the full range of imaginable circumstances such as the possibilities that I’ve barely touched upon in the bullet points above.
I’ve seen often enough how hard it can be for one committed couple to agree on the new home they seek for themselves. To have more individuals involved has to make even that process more difficult by whole magnitudes, never mind all the other areas of potential disagreement that are bound to follow.
Although any tradeoffs of collective homeownership may, for some, prove to be a better option than spending too much of their income on rent or mortgage payments, the participants certainly need to go down that road not with starry eyes but with hard-nosed analysis.
Frankly, I’m pretty cynical about the odds of success.
Next: A cup runneth. . . (No Weekly Roundup until April 5)
To take your own bite out of the Big Apple, you have the option here to search all available properties privately.
Subscribe by Email




Malcolm Carter
Licensed Associate Real Estate Broker
Senior Vice President
Charles Rutenberg Realty
127 E. 56th Street
New York, NY 10022
M: 347-886-0248
F: 347-438-3201
Malcolm@ServiceYouCanTrust.com
Web site
Like this:
Like Loading...
Only tenants have certain rights in unlivable unit
March 28, 2013After Sandy struck, residents of 88 Greenwich St. in the Financial District originally were told it would be four months before they could go home.
There is a section of property law that declares tenants’ right to live in conditions not dangerous, hazardous or detrimental to their life, health or safety.
Under the “warranty of habitability,” tenants have the right to a livable, safe and sanitary apartment.
Under the warranty — in other words, guarantee — a unit must provide heat or hot water on a regular basis. Other issues include, leaks, mold, broken plumbing, elevator service in high-rise building and insect infestation.
It is up to the landlord to remediate conditions that make a rental unit unlivable, no matter the cause. If a landlord fails to act, the warranty of habitability provides tenants with the opportunity to obtain financial relief in one of three ways. (more…)
Share this:
Like this:
Tags:88 Greenwich St., Apartments, Co-ops, Condos, New York Real Estate, Rent, sandy, Warrant of habitability
Posted in Co-ops and Condos, Commentary, Real Estate | Leave a Comment »