If real estate brokers receive little respect, there is ample reason. In this three-part series, I’ll provide examples that prove the point, explain what is required of brokers in New York now and suggest a solution.
It does not surprise me, and certainly won’t surprise you, that 30 percent of respondents in a Harris Interactive Poll said real estate agents and brokers deserved “hardly any prestige.”
Their assessment was exceeded by a couple of points only by the categories of actor and stockbroker. As for having “very great prestige,” real estate agents and brokers were 23rd on the list, attaining a mere 5 percent—below farmer, union leader and accountant.
I have found myself blogging regularly about the unprofessional, rude, incompetent or unethical actions of other real estate practitioners. Consider these examples (which you can find at greater length by following the links): Continue reading →
Data through January in the S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Indices show that the annual rates of decline of the 10-City and 20-City Composites improved in comparison with December.
The gauges, which omit apartment sales and include whole metropolitan regions, actually had the 10-City Composite unchanged from a year ago and the 20-City Composite down only 0.7 percent versus January 2009.
Annual rates for the two Composites have not been so close to a positive print for three years. Commented Standard & Poor’s David M. Blitzer: Continue reading →
Hanging sculptures designed with or without your input represent one of three options that A.R.T. offers at unusually reasonable prices.
Donald Rattner, a friend who is a successful architect, is branching out – almost literally. He has started a business called A.R.T., which Don characterizes as “a new way to create, collect and think about contemporary art” by making high quality, original art more accessible to more people.
He and his wife Gaby opened a pop-up store in Brooklyn’s pulsating DUMBO (near Grimaldi’s impossibly popular restaurant) that I visited a few days ago, and I was blown away by the quality of the design and the level of creativity. Best of all, the prices are within reach of many consumers.
The average price of one module ranges from $38/unit to $55/unit for the shelf art and $45 to $60 for the wall art per module, with a minimum order of two or three units, depending on the line. Mural art runs $8-10 a square foot. Continue reading →
After literally decades of campaigning by the Council of New York Cooperatives and Condominiums, as well as others, a limitation on the amount of money that a co-op building can collect in rent from commercial (technically, patronage) operations was changed in December 2007 starting that tax year.
The impact of what was an expanded definition of “cooperative” has yet to be fully realized, though there are isolated instances of occasionally enormous benefits.
Until it was changed, the so-called 80-20 rule prevented cooperatives from enjoying a tax deduction for their expenditures on property taxes and mortgage interest if their income from retail stores, garages and such exceeded their operating budgets by 20 percent.
As a result, many commercial tenants were paying a pittance in rent, including nothing in the case of a few nonprofits such as, say, thrift shops.
With a new, more comprehensive definition of “cooperative” in the revised IRS rule, buildings now can permit the budgetary contribution of commercial rent to go over 20 percent. Continue reading →
Boston-based CondoDomain, a Web-based discount real estate brokerage, is now a member of the Real Estate Board of New York, offering offers a VOW (Virtual Office Web site), reports the Real Deal. That means that customers who log onto the company’s New York site can browse through the listings in REBNY’s database, which is far from comprehensive.
CondoDomain founder and told the Real Dealthat the appearance of VOWs in New York City has opened the floodgates for new companies like his to penetrate the lucrative New York City market.
“The VOW will lay the groundwork for companies like ours to come in and compete,” CEO Anthony Longo told the publication. Continue reading →
She is a first-rate broker with a raft of listings. When a client of mine wanted to see one of them on Manhattan’s Upper West Side, I e-mailed that information to the broker, whom I’ll call “Gina,” touching off a dispute that riles me even as I pen this post.
To put the e-mail exchange in context, you need to know that I had asked on Tuesday, March 9, for an appointment at 10 a.m. on the Saturday before the one that is the subject of the e-mails below.
Gina wrote back what would work for her: later than 10 a.m. on Saturday or at an open house on Sunday. She didn’t provide details. When no open house appeared on the listing by that Thursday, I decided to e-mail her once again. Only in that way did I learn of one being scheduled for that Sunday at times she ultimately provided to me.
I did reach the author of the advertisement in the New York Times (published again on Sunday) that provoked my interest. That’s the one in which was promised a doubling of investors’ money within three years.
Apparently there is more than one way to sell a house. (Flickr photo by sean dreilinger.)
I’m still not sure what he’s about after talking on the telephone to Southampton-based Peter Clarke, 50, for about 10 minutes before he abruptly hung up on me, saying, “We’re done, thanks.” Continue reading →
Bankruptcy auction of Times Square condo attracts a crowd.
At the Hotel Roosevelt on Friday, a financial planner from New Jersey was the winning bidder for a 668-sf, one-bedroom, one-bath condo on the 10th floor of a new development overlooking Times Square. Continue reading →
Scanning the newspaper the other day, I became intrigued with the advertisement reproduced above at its actual size. It managed to attract my attention even though I fall depressingly short of the amount requested.
Not only did the author’s rudimentary grasp of grammar and spelling – which is more evident on his various Web sites – interest me, but I was astonished to read that someone actually was promising, promising,to double some dupe’s money in three years.
Now, I don’t know what, if any, laws the company might be breaking or whether, if so, it is breaking the law wittingly.
However, I learned at my late father’s knee that – everybody chime in – if something seems to good to be true, then it must not be true.
So I went to the Web site in the ad, which in itself was not in the least illuminating. It provided a Park Avenue address, though no suite number, plus the telephone number that is printed above. Looks like a cell phone number, right? I’m at this point thinking “fly by night.” Continue reading →